科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. All the cases were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Observation group was treated with shaft method to place biological mesh, while control group was treated with traditional tiling method. The length of the operation, hospital fees, and rate of occurrence of surgical complications were compared. All 60 cases were successfully treated with laparoscope inguinal hernia repair. None were converted to open operations. Total operation times for the observation group and control group were 54 +/- 4.5 and 71 +/- 7.2 minutes, respectively (P<.05). The hospital fees of the observation group and control group were 21,280 +/- 365 RenMinBi Yuan (RMB) and 24,280 +/- 428 RMB, respectively (P<.05). The rates of occurrence of surgical complications were 3.33% (1/30) and 16.7% (5/30), respectively (P<.05). The shaft method can be applied in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with biological mesh. Compared with the traditional method, the shaft method has apparent advantages, fewer complications during and after the operation.
