A novel truncated cone helix energy pile: Numerical and laboratory investigations of thermal performance

作者:Liu, Yajiao; Huang, Guangqin*; Lu, Jun; Yang, Xiaofeng; Zhuang, Chunlong
来源:International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 126: 681-699.
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.002

摘要

As for the cylinder helix energy pile (CyHEP), in order to reduce thermal interference and improve heat transfer efficiency, a novel truncated cone helix energy pile (CoHEP) was proposed in this paper. A 3-D numerical model both considering the dynamic surface condition and the initial soil temperature distribution was developed to investigate its thermal performance, and three main influencing factors (inlet water temperature, water flow rate, cone angle) were studied by the established model. In addition, the laboratory investigation was carried out to verify the accuracy of the numerical model. The results indicate that the heat flux per unit pipe length of the 20 degrees cone angle CoHEP is 6.16% larger than the traditional CyHEP. The whole pipe of CoHEP can be divided into four stages along the flow direction of the pipe length: the entrance stage -> the thermal short circuit stage -> the small temperature difference stage -> the exit stage. During the design of CoHEP, the proportion of the thermal short circuit stage and the small temperature difference stage should be reduced to ensure the overall heat transfer capability. Heat flux per unit pipe length of the CoHEP increases linearly with the inlet water temperature. Increasing the water flow rate can increase the heat flux per unit pipe length of the CoHEP, but it can also reduce the flow time in the pipe, resulting in insufficient heat exchange. As for the cone angle, increasing the cone angle can effectively reduce the radial thermal interference at the upper part of CoHEP and the axial thermal interference. When the system running time is 12 h, as the cone angle increases from 0 degrees to 10 degrees to 20 degrees, the growth rates of heat flux per unit pipe length are 2.54% and 3.53% respectively. Moreover, there must be an allowable maximum cone angle considering the minimum spiral radius of PE pipe, for example, the allowable optimal cone angle is 21 degrees for the model built in the paper.