Dental ceramics: A CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences

作者：del Mar Perez Maria; Ghinea Razvan; Javier Herrera Luis; Maria Ionescu Ana; Pomares Hector; Pulgar Rosa; Paravina Rade D

来源：Journal of Dentistry, 2011, 39: E37-E44.

DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.007

• CIEDE2000
• Dental ceramics
• Lightness
• Chroma
• Hue
• Acceptability thresholds
• Parametric factors

Objectives: To determine the visual 50:50% acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue for dental ceramics using CIEDE2000(K(L):K(C):K(H)) formula, and to evaluate the formula performance using different parametric factors.
Methods: A 30-observer panel evaluated three subsets of ceramic samples: lightness subset (vertical bar Delta L'/Delta E(oo)vertical bar >= 0.9), chroma subset (vertical bar Delta C'/Delta E(oo)vertical bar >= 0.9) and hue subset (vertical bar Delta H'/Delta E(oo)vertical bar >= 0.9). A Takagi-Sugeno-Kang Fuzzy Approximation was used as fitting procedure, and the 50: 50% acceptability thresholds were calculated. A t-test was used in statistical analysis of the thresholds values. The performance of the CIEDE2000(1: 1: 1) and CIEDE2000(2: 1: 1) color difference formulas against visual results was tested using PF/3 performance factor.
Results: The 50: 50% CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds were Delta L' = 2.92 (95% CI 1.22-4.96; r(2) = 0.76), Delta C' = 2.52 (95% CI 1.31-4.19; r(2) = 0.71) and Delta H' = 1.90 (95% CI 1.63-2.15; r(2) = 0.88). The 50: 50% acceptability threshold for color difference (Delta E') for CIEDE2000(1: 1: 1) was 1.87, whilst corresponding value for CIEDE2000(2: 1: 1) was 1.78. The PF/3 values were 139.86 for CIEDE2000(1: 1: 1), and 132.31 for CIEDE2000(2: 1: 1).
Conclusions: There was a statistically significant difference amongst CIEDE2000 50: 50% acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences for dental ceramics. The CIEDE2000(2: 1: 1) formula performed better than CIEDE2000(1: 1: 1).

• 出版日期2011-12