Second-line treatments for dyslipidemia in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease

作者：Kondo Yoshinobu; Hamai Junko; Nezu Uru; Shigematsu Erina; Kamiko Kazunari; Yamazaki Shunsuke; Yoshii Taishi; Takahashi Mayumi; Takano Tatsuro; Kawasaki Satsuki; Yamada Masayo; Yamakawa Tadashi; Terauchi Yasuo^*

来源：Endocrine Journal, 2014, 61(4): 343-351.

DOI：10.1507/endocrj.EJ13-0404

• Dyslipidemia
• Second-line treatment
• Statins
• Ezetimibe

Previous studies have shown that approximately 50% patients at risk of cardiovascular disease do not achieve lipid management goals. Thus, improvements dyslipidemia management are needed. We investigated the clinical choice and efficacy of second-line treatments for dyslipidemia in the Japanese clinical setting. Using a retrospective cohort design, we collected lipid profile data from patients who had been treated with hypolipidemic agents at a stable dosage for at least 12 weeks. These patients had then been administered a second-line treatment for dyslipidemia because they had not achieved the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management goals. We included data from 641 patients in our analysis. The top three choices for second-line treatment were adding ezetimibe, switching to strong statins (statin switching), and doubling the original statin dosage (statin doubling). Adding ezetimibe, statin switching, and statin doubling decreased LDL-C levels by 28.2 +/- 14.5%, 23.2 +/- 24.4%, and 23.5 +/- 17.2%, respectively. Among these three strategies, adding ezetimibe decreased LDL-C levels to the maximum extent. In patients with dysglycemia, baseline-adjusted change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased slightly in the adding-ezetimibe, statin-switching, and statin-doubling groups, but the differences were not statistically significant among the groups (-0.10 +/- 0.62%, -0.22 +/- 0.54%, and -0.12 +/- 0.52%, p = 0.19). In conclusion, the most common second-line treatment options for dyslipidemia were adding ezetimibe, statin switching, or statin doubling. Adding ezetimibe resulted in the highest reduction in LDL-C levels. These strategies did not increase HbA1c levels when administered with conventional diabetes treatment.

• 出版日期2014-4