A Randomized Comparison Study of Aquacel Ag and Glucan II as Donor Site Dressings With Regard to Healing Time, Cosmesis, Infection Rate, and Patient's Perceived Pain: A Pilot Study

作者：Bailey Suzanne^*; Carmean Melissa; Cinat Marianne; Burton Kimberly; Lane Christopher; Malinoski Darren

来源：Journal of Burn Care and Research, 2011, 32(6): 627-632.

DOI：10.1097/BCR.0b013e31822dc409

This study was undertaken to compare pain, healing time, infection rate, and cosmetic outcome between Aquacel Ag (Convatec) and Glucan II (Brennan Medical) as donor site dressings. The authors performed a prospective, randomized, patient-controlled study. Eligible patients had two donor sites harvested. One site was dressed with Aquacel Ag and the other site with Glucan II. Patients were followed at set time points for 6 months to determine the rate of epithelialization, patient's perceived pain, infection rate, and the cosmetic outcome. A total of 20 patients were enrolled in the study. All patient data were collected through reepithelialization. The average time to wound healing for Aquacel Ag was 12.5 +/- 2.07 days compared with Glucan II 12.7 +/- 1.99 days. Perceived pain scores for each donor site were recorded. On postoperative day 5, patients reported significantly less pain with the Aquacel Ag site (Aquacel Ag 1.75 vs Glucan II 2.5, P = .02). Three donor sites showed clinical signs of infection (two Glucan II and one Aquacel Ag) prompting culture and dressing removal. There was no statistically significant difference in cosmetic outcomes of the donor sites at any time point. When comparing Aquacel Ag and Glucan II, our study has determined that there is no significant difference with regard to healing time, infection rates, and cosmetic outcomes. Both dressings are comparable with regard to ease of application and postoperative care. (J Burn Care Res 2011;32:627-632)

• 出版日期2011-12