Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Does It Have Benefits for the Surgeon in the Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Cancer of the Oral Cavity?

作者：Olasz Lajos^*; Szalma Jozsef; Orsi Eniko; Tornoczky Tamas; Marko Tamas; Nyarady Zoltan

来源：Pathology and Oncology Research, 2010, 16(2): 207-212.

DOI：10.1007/s12253-009-9208-3

• OSCC
• Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
• Surgical margin
• Primary tumor regression
• Oral cancer

The purpose of this clinicopathological study was to evaluate the effects and efficiency of combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy related to surgical margin. 100 consecutively treated squamous cell cancer patients receiving a combined neoadjuvant therapy were selected (Bleomycin-Vincristin-Methotrexate (BVM) or BVM + Mitolactol or BVM + Cisplatin). After three courses of chemotherapy, the patients were operated on. The largest diameter of the primary tumors was compared before and after chemotherapy. In the surgical specimen, the involvement of surgical margin was assessed. The largest diameter before chemotherapy was: T2 30%; T3 55%; T4A 15%. After chemotherapy, the rest tumor was assessed in the surgical specimen as: no rest 11%; < 2 cm 57%; 2-4 cm 28%; 4-6 cm 4%. The no rest and < 2 cm (optimal operability) tumor was observed in T2: 94%; in T3: 73%; in the T4A: 0%. Severe side effects (Grade III-IV) were not observed. There was a significant decrease in size (P < 0.0001). Of the 100 surgical specimens, 83% had clear-, 9% close- and 8% involved margins. From T4A, there was a 40% (6 patients) involved margin. Based on the significantly better size and operability of primary T2-3, the mild side effects and the high (83%) percentage of clear surgical margins, that is better than other (without preoperative chemotherapy) results, sought the use of chemotherapy is recommended before surgery. Due to the 40% involved margin, we don't suggest surgery in T4A.

• 出版日期2010-6