科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Purpose: To compare low and standard radiation doses in intravenous contrast material-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in young adults.
Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. The study included 257 patients (age range, 15-40 years) who underwent CT for suspected appendicitis performed by using a low radiation dose (n = 125) or a standard radiation dose (n = 132). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the diagnosis of appendicitis and diagnostic confidence as recorded in prospective CT reports between the two groups.
Results: For 55 low-radiation-dose (median dose-length product, 122 mGy . cm) and 44 standard-dose (median dose-length product, 544 mGy . cm) examinations, one of two abdominal radiologists made primary reports that served as final reports. For the remaining examinations, on-call radiologists with differing levels of experience issued preliminary reports and the two abdominal radiologists then provided final reports. In the primary reports, the low-and standard-dose CT groups did not significantly differ in area under the ROC curve (0.96 vs 0.97, P = .76), sensitivity (90% [38 of 42] vs 89% [47 of 53], P > .99), or specificity (92% [76 of 83] vs 94% [74 of 79], P = .74) in the diagnosis of appendicitis. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in the confidence level when diagnosing (P = .71) or excluding (P = .20) appendicitis in the primary reports. Similar results were observed for the final reports. The two dose groups also did not significantly differ in terms of appendiceal visualization, diagnosis of appendiceal perforation, or sensitivity for alternative diagnoses.
Conclusion: Low-dose CT may have comparable diagnostic performance to standard-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in young adults.
- 出版日期2011-8
