A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Preemptive Antifungal Therapy for the Prevention of Invasive Candidiasis Following Gastrointestinal Surgery for Intra-abdominal Infections

作者：Knitsch Wolfgang; Vincent Jean Louis; Utzolino Stefan; Francois Bruno; Dinya Tamas; Dimopoulos George; Oezguenes Ilhan; Carlos Valia Juan; Eggimann Philippe; Leon Cristobal; Montravers Philippe; Phillips Stephen; Tweddle Lorraine; Karas Andreas; Brown Malcolm; Cornely Oliver A^*

来源：Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2015, 61(11): 1671-1678.

DOI：10.1093/cid/civ707

• Preemptive antifungal therapy
• invasive candidiasis
• micafungin
• intensive care
• gastrointestinal surgery

Background. Patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery for intra-abdominal infection are at risk of invasive candidiasis (IC) and candidates for preemptive antifungal therapy.
Methods. This exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed a preemptive antifungal approach with micafungin (100 mg/d) in intensive care unit patients requiring surgery for intra-abdominal infection. Coprimary efficacy variables were the incidence of IC and the time from baseline to first IC in the full analysis set; an independent data review board confirmed IC. An exploratory biomarker analysis was performed using logistic regression.
Results. The full analysis set comprised 124 placebo-and 117 micafungin-treated patients. The incidence of IC was 8.9% for placebo and 11.1% for micafungin (difference, 2.24%; [95% confidence interval, -5.52 to 10.20]). There was no difference between the arms in median time to IC. The estimated odds ratio showed that patients with a positive (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (beta DG) result were 3.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-13.29) times more likely to have confirmed IC than those with a negative result.
Conclusions. This study was unable to provide evidence that preemptive administration of an echinocandin was effective in preventing IC in high-risk surgical intensive care unit patients with intra-abdominal infections. This may have been because the drug was administered too late to prevent IC coupled with an overall low number of IC events. It does provide some support for using beta DG to identify patients at high risk of IC.

• 出版日期2015-12-1