科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Objective: To compare the outcome of Milligan-Morgan (MMH) and Ferguson (FH) techniques for haemorrhoidectomy with regard to postoperative pain, control of bleeding, early mobilization of patients and wound healing.
Methodology: In this prospective, randomized clinical study conducted between January 2005 to December 2008, 213 patients with late 2nd degree; third or fourth degree hemorrhoids were assigned to two groups. One hundred ten patients in group A were operated by an open method and 103 patients in group B were operated by closed method.
Results: Age ranged from 22-70 years with mean age of 45.5 years. Peak incidence was between 4150 years. Out of 213 patients, 170 (79.81%) were male and 43 (20.18%) were females. The mean +/- SD operating time was significantly more in group B (31.3 +/- 4.8 min) than group A (25.2 +/- 5.6). The duration of hospitalization and duration off from work was more in group A than the group B. Wound healing was quicker in group B than the group A. Post operative pain scores were significantly low in the Group A than Group B during first 24 hours and at first bowel movements. Reactionary hemorrhage occurred in 4 (3.63%) patients of group A, no patient in group B developed this complication. Retention of urine was seen in 13 (11.81%) patients in group A and 4 (3.88%) in group B. No patient in group A developed anal stenosis, while 3 (2.91%) patients in group B developed anal stenosis. Wound infection was one (0.9%) in group A and two (1.9%) in group B. Two (3.63%) patients in group A came with recurrent hemorrhoids and in group B, only one (0.97%) patient reported recurrence.
Conclusions: The closed technique is more beneficial with respect to postoperative pain, control of bleeding, early mobilization of patients and wound healing.
- 出版日期2013-3
