Antibacterial Effects of Fluoride Varnish Compared with Chlorhexidine Plus Fluoride in Disabled Children

作者：Baygin Ozgul^*; Tuzuner Tamer; Kusgoz Adem; Senel Ahmet Can; Tanriver Mehmet; Arslan Ipek

来源：Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, 2014, 12(4): 373-382.

DOI：10.3290/j.ohpd.a32129

• antibacterial effect
• children with disability
• chlorhexidine
• fluoride
• general anaesthesia

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of fluoride varnish vs a combination of chlorhexidine-thymol varnish plus a gel containing chlorhexidine and fluoride on oral hygiene and caries prevention in disabled children.
Materials and Methods: Ninety patients aged 3-17 years who were treated under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned into three groups as follows: group 1: Fluor Protector (0.1% fluoride varnish); group 2: Cervitec Plus (1% chlorhexidine-1% thymol varnish) + Cervitec Gel (0.2% chlorhexidine-0.2% sodium fluoride); group 3: control (toothbrushing only). Mutans streptococci (MS) and lactobacilli (LB) levels, visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI) were evaluated at four stages: T-0, before general anaesthesia; T-1, one month after treatment; T-2, six months after treatment; T-3, twelve months after treatment. The data were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests (P < 0.05).
Results: Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower scores than group 3 for all parameters at T-1 and T-2. No statistically significant difference was detected among any of the the groups at T-3 (P> 0.05).
Conclusion: The use of materials that include both fluoride and chlorhexidine as routine treatment of children with disability may increase the success of restorations by improving oral hygiene, reduce the need for future restorative treatments and thus the need for general anaesthesia.

• 出版日期2014