科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Background The optimal treatment sequence of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) and pemetrexed in previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients is currently unknown. Methods This retrospective study explored two sequential regimens incorporating EGFR TKIs and pemetrexed in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who had failed standard first-line chemotherapy. The medical records of 83 patients were carefully reviewed. 45 patients who received second-line EGFR TKIs followed by third-line pemetrexed were grouped as cohort A. 38 patients who received a strategy with the reverse sequence were grouped as cohort B. Progression-free survival, disease control duration and survival time were compared between the two cohorts. Results Median survival time is significantly longer in cohort A compared with cohort B (23.615 months vs. 16.269 months, HR: 0.549, 95% CI: 0.308-0.979, P = 0.042). Median disease control duration is 17.463 months in cohort A versus 11.587 months in cohort B (HR: 0.700, 95% CI: 0.409-1.196, P = 0.191). Median progression-free survival with second-line EGFR TKIs is significantly longer than second-line pemetrexed (8.056 months vs. 4.200 months, HR: 0.462, 95% CI: 0.281-0.758, P = 0.001). Median progression-free survival with third-line EGFR TKIs is 6.885 months versus 7.624 months with third-line pemetrexed (HR: 0.462, 95% CI: 0.605-1.767, P = 0.902). The rate of response to EGFR TKIs is higher in second-line setting than in third-line (44% vs. 34%). Conclusions We hypothesized that for EGFR-mutated patients, second-line EGFR TKIs followed by third-line pemetrexed is preferable to the reverse sequence.
