Decarboxylation versus Acetonitrile Loss in Silver Acetate and Silver Propiolate Complexes, [RCO2Ag2(CH3CN)(n)](+) (where R = CH3 and CH3C C; n=1 and 2)

作者：Li Jiawei; Khairallah George N; O'Hair Richard A J^*

来源：Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2015, 68(9): 1385-1391.

DOI：10.1071/CH15210

Gas-phase experiments using collision-induced dissociation in an ion trap mass spectrometer have been used in combination with density functional theory (DFT) calculations (at the B3LYP/SDD6-31+G(d) level of theory) to examine the competition between decarboxylation and loss of a coordinated acetonitrile in the unimolecular fragmentation reactions of the silver acetate and silver propiolate complexes, [RCO2Ag2(CH3CN)(n)](+) (where R = CH3 and CH3C C; n = 1 and 2), introduced into the gas-phase via electrospray ionisation. When R = CH3, loss of acetonitrile is the sole reaction channel observed for both complexes (n = 1 and 2), consistent with DFT calculations, which highlight that the barriers for decarboxylation 2.18 eV (n = 2) and 1.96 eV (n = 1) are greater than the binding energies of the coordinated acetonitriles (1.60 eV for n = 2; 1.64 eV for n = 1). In contrast, when R = CH3C C, decarboxylation is the main fragmentation pathway observed for both complexes (n = 1 and 2), with loss of acetonitrile only being a minor product channel. This is consistent with DFT calculations, which reveal that the barriers for decarboxylation are 1.17 eV (n = 2) and 1.16 eV (n = 1), which are both below the binding energies of the coordinated acetonitriles (1.55 eV for n = 2; 1.56 eV for n = 1). The barrier for decarboxylation of [CH3C CCO2Ag2] (+) is 1.22 eV, which is less than the 2.06 eV reported for decarboxylation of [CH3CO2Ag2](+) (Al Sharif et al. Organometallics, 2013, 32, 5416). The observed ease of decarboxylation of silver propiolate complexes in the gas-phase is consistent with the recently reported use of silver salts in metal catalysed decarboxylative C-C and C-X bond forming reactions of propiolic acids.

• 出版日期2015