科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Background We wanted to find out if the additional costs of depot neuroleptic in comparison to oral medication was justified by a decrease in admission days. Methods An open study on a cohort of chronic psychotic out-patients (n = 45) consisting of a retrospective 10-year period on oral medication followed by a prospective 5-year period of treatment with haloperidol decanoate. After recording socio-demographic characteristics and a DSM-III-R diagnosis, patients were assessed before and after the administration of depot neuroleptic with the BPRS, the NOSIE, the SDRS and a list of side effects. A semi-structured interview was conducted with the patients and their families to ask about the change in social relationships with family members and other people after starting the depot treatment. Social intervention was limited to involvement of the family in the monthly depot medication outpatient clinic and to an explanation of the rationale of follow-up treatment and deinstitutionalisation of psychiatric care in the village of origin. Results The number of admission days decreased from an average of 100 days a year on oral medication to 5 days a year on depot neuroleptic. Patients report a sharp decrease in symptoms paralleled by an increase in social functioning over the first 3 months. After 6-9 months this pattern stabilised and was maintained over the period from 1 to 5 years whereas the dosage was further decreased to an average of 1 cc decanoate or 20 haldol equivalents monthly. Conclusions This study suggests that depot neuroleptic in the context of a public mental health approach is a highly effective and feasible treatment for West African patients suffering from a chronic functional psychosis.
- 出版日期2006-11
