Using "Roll-up" Measures in Healthcare Quality Reports: Perspectives of Report Sponsors and National Alliances

作者：Cerully Jennifer L^*; Martino Steven C; Rybowski Lise; Finucane Melissa L; Grob Rachel; Parker Andrew M; Schlesinger Mark; Shaller Dale; Martsolf Grant

来源：American Journal of Managed Care, 2017, 23(6): E202-E207.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the views of prominent organizations in the field of healthcare quality on the topic of reporting roll-up measures that combine indicators of multiple, often disparate, dimensions of care to consumers.
STUDY DESIGN: This study used a semi-structured, qualitative interview design.
METHODS: We conducted 30-to 60-minute semistructured telephone interviews with representatives of 10 organizations that sponsor public healthcare quality reports and 3 national alliances representing multiple stakeholder groups. We conducted a thematic analysis of interview transcriptions to identify common issues and concerns related to reporting roll-up measures.
RESULTS: Among sponsors reporting roll-up measures, current practices for calculating and reporting these measures are diverse. The main perceived benefit of reporting roll-up measures is that they simplify large amounts of complex information for consumers. The main concern is the potential for consumers to misunderstand the measures and what associated roll-up scores communicate about provider performance. Report sponsors and national alliances feel that more guidance and research on the methods for producing and reporting scores for roll-up measures are needed.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the interviews elucidate the need for research focused on construction and reporting of roll-up measures. Studies are needed to determine if roll-up measures are indeed perceived by consumers as being less complex and easier to understand.

• 出版日期2017-6