Assessment of myocardial viability: Comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the current era

作者：Tomlinson David R; Becher Harald; Selvanayagam Joseph B^*

来源：Heart Lung and Circulation, 2008, 17(3): 173-185.

DOI：10.1016/j.hlc.2007.10.005

• myocardial viability
• dobutamine stress echocardiography
• tissue Doppler echocardiography
• myocardial contrast echocardiography
• cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Detecting viable myocardium, whether hibernating or stunned, is of clinical significance in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Echocardiographic assessments of myocardial thickening and endocardial excursion during dobutamine infusion provide a highly specific marker for myocardial viability, but with relatively less sensitivity. The additional modalities of myocardial contrast echocardiography and tissue Doppler have recently been proposed to provide further, quantitative measures of myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become popular for the assessment of myocardial viability as it can assess cardiac function, volumes, myocardial scar, and perfusion with high-spatial resolution. Both 'delayed enhancement' CMR and dobutamine stress CMR have important roles in the assessment of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This article reviews the recent advances in both echocardiography and CMR for the clinical assessment of myocardial viability. It attempts to provide a pragmatic approach toward the patient-specific assessment of this important clinical problem.

• 出版日期2008-6