Dual-Source Single-Energy Multidetector CT Used to Obtain Multiple Radiation Exposure Levels within the Same Patient: Phantom Development and Clinical Validation

作者：Bellini Davide; Ramirez Giraldo Juan Carlos; Bibbey Alex; Solomon Justin; Hurwitz Lynne M; Farjat Alfredo; Mileto Achille; Samei Ehsan; Marin Daniele^*

来源：Radiology, 2017, 283(2): 526-537.

DOI：10.1148/radiol.2016161233

Purpose: To develop, in a phantom environment, a method to obtain multidetector computed tomographic (CT) data sets at multiple radiation exposure levels within the same patient and to validate its use for potential dose reduction by using different image reconstruction algorithms for the detection of liver metastases.
Materials and Methods: The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanned by using a dual-source multidetector CT platform. By adjusting the radiation output of each tube, data sets at six radiation exposure levels (100%, 75%, 50%, 37.5%, 25%, and 12.5%) were reconstructed from two consecutive dual-source single-energy (DSSE) acquisitions, as well as a conventional single-source acquisition. A prospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review boardapproved study was performed by using the same DSSE strategy in 19 patients who underwent multidetector CT of the liver for metastatic colorectal cancer. All images were reconstructed by using conventional weighted filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction with strength level of 3 (SAFIRE-3). Objective image quality metrics were compared in the phantom experiment by using multiple linear regression analysis. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze image quality metrics and diagnostic performance for lesion detection by readers.
Results: The phantom experiment showed comparable image quality between DSSE and conventional single-source acquisition. In the patient study, the mean size-specific dose estimates for the six radiation exposure levels were 13.0, 9.8, 5.8, 4.4, 3.2, and 1.4 mGy. For each radiation exposure level, readers' perception of image quality and lesion conspicuity was consistently ranked superior with SAFIRE-3 when compared with FBP (P <=.05 for all comparisons). Reduction of up to 62.5% in radiation exposure by using SAFIRE-3 yielded similar reader rankings of image quality and lesion conspicuity when compared with routine-dose FBP.
Conclusion: A method was developed and validated to synthesize multidetector CT data sets at multiple radiation exposure levels within the same patient. This technique may provide a foundation for future clinical trials aimed at estimating potential radiation dose reduction by using iterative reconstructions.

• 出版日期2017-5