Dosimetric and delivery characterizations of full-arc and half-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy for maxillary cancer

作者：Miura Hideharu^*; Fujiwara Masayuki; Tanooka Masao; Doi Hiroshi; Inoue Hiroyuki; Takada Yasuhiro; Kamikonya Norihiko; Hirota Shozo

来源：Journal of Radiation Research, 2012, 53(5): 785-790.

DOI：10.1093/jrr/rrs031

• Volumetric-modulated arc therapy
• gantry acceleration
• gantry angle error
• planning study
• maxillary cancer

We compared the efficiency and accuracy of full-arc and half-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery for maxillary cancer. Plans for gantry rotation angles of 360 and 180 (full-arc and half-arc VMAT) were created for six maxillary cancer cases with the Monaco treatment planning system, and delivered using an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator. Full-arc and half-arc VMAT were compared with regard to homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), mean dose to normal brain, total monitor units (MU), delivery times, root mean square (r.m.s.) gantry accelerations (degrees/s(2)), and rims. gantry angle errors (degrees). The half-arc VMAT plans achieved comparable HI and Cl to the full-arc plans. Mean doses to the normal brain and brainstem with the half-arc VMAT plans were on average 16% and 17% lower than those with the full-arc VMAT plans. For other organs at risk (OARs), no significant DVH differences were observed between plans. Half-arc VMAT resulted in 11% less total MU and 20% shorter delivery time than the full-arc VMAT, while r.m.s. gantry acceleration and rims. gantry angle error during half-arc VMAT delivery were 30% and 23% less than those during full-arc VMAT delivery, respectively. Furthermore, the half-arc VMAT plans were comparable with the full-arc plans regarding close homogeneity and conformity in maxillary cancer, and provided a statistical decrease in mean dose to OAR, total MU, delivery time and gantry angle error. Half-arc VMAT plans may be a suitable treatment option in radiotherapy for maxillary cancer.

• 出版日期2012-9