科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Three common approaches to (F) over right arrow = m<(a)over right arrow are: (1) as an exactly true definition of force <(F)over right arrow in terms of measured inertial mass m and measured acceleration <(a)over right arrow; (2) as an exactly true axiom relating measured values of <(a)over right arrow, <(F)over right arrow and m and (3) as an imperfect but accurately true physical law relating measured <(a)over right arrow to measured <(F)over right arrow, with m an experimentally determined, matter-dependent constant, in the spirit of the resistance R in Ohm's law. In the third case, the natural units are those of <(a)over right arrow and <(F)over right arrow, where <(a)over right arrow is normally specified using distance and time as standard units, and <(F)over right arrow from a spring scale as a standard unit; thus mass units are derived from force, distance, and time units such as newtons, meters, and seconds. The present work develops the third approach when one includes a second physical law (again, imperfect but accurate) that balance-scale weight W is proportional to m-and the fact that balance-scale measurements of relative weight are more accurate than those of absolute force. When distance and time also are more accurately measurable than absolute force, this second physical law permits a shift to standards of mass, distance, and time units, such as kilograms, meters, and seconds, with the unit of force the newton a derived unit. However, were force and distance more accurately measurable than time (e.g., time measured with an hourglass), this second physical law would permit a shift to standards of force, mass, and distance units such as newtons, kilograms, and meters, with the unit of time the second a derived unit. Therefore, the choice of the most accurate standard units depends both on what is most accurately measurable and on the accuracy of physical law.
- 出版日期2014-4
