No suitable precise or optimized epidemiologic search filters were available for bibliographic databases

作者：Waffenschmidt Siw^*; Herrnanns Tatjana; Gerber Grote Andreas; Mostardt Sarah

来源：Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017, 82: 112-118.

DOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.008

• Information storage and retrieval
• Evidence-based medicine
• Databases bibliographic
• MEDLINE
• Review literature as topic
• Epidemiology

Objectives: To determine a suitable approach to a systematic search for epidemiologic publications in bibliographic databases. For this purpose, suitable sensitive, precise, and optimized filters were to be selected for MEDLINE searches. In addition, the relevance of bibliographic databases was determined.
Study Design and Setting: Epidemiologic systematic reviews (SRs) retrieved in a systematic search and company dossiers were screened to identify epidemiologic publications (primary studies and SRs) published since 2007. These publications were used to generate a test and validation set. Furthermore, each SR's search strategy was reviewed, and epidemiologic filters were extracted. The search syntaxes were validated using the relative recall method.
Results: The test set comprises 729 relevant epidemiologic publications, of which 566 were MEDLINE-indexed. About 27 epidemiologic filters were extracted. One suitable sensitive filter was identified (Larney et al. 2013: 95.94% sensitivity). Precision was presumably underestimated so that no precise or optimized filters can be recommended. About 77.64% of the publications were found in MEDLINE.
Conclusion: There is currently no suitable approach to conducting efficient systematic searches for epidemiologic publications in bibliographic databases. The filter by Larney et al. (2013) can be used for sensitive MEDLINE searches. No robust conclusions can be drawn on precise or optimized filters. Additional search approaches should be considered.

• 出版日期2017-2