Heritable patterns of tooth decay in the permanent dentition: principal components and factor analyses

作者：Shaffer John R^*; Feingold Eleanor; Wang Xiaojing; TCuenco Karen; Weeks Daniel E; DeSensi Rebecca S; Polk Deborah E; Wendell Steve; Weyant Robert J; Crout Richard; McNeil Daniel W; Marazita Mary L

来源：BMC Oral Health, 2012, 12: 7.

DOI：10.1186/1472-6831-12-7

• Dental caries genetics
• Heritability
• Permanent dentition
• Pit and fissure surfaces
• Smooth surfaces
• Tooth surfaces
• Principal components analysis
• Factor analysis
• Patterns of tooth decay
• Patterns of dental caries

Background: Dental caries is the result of a complex interplay among environmental, behavioral, and genetic factors, with distinct patterns of decay likely due to specific etiologies. Therefore, global measures of decay, such as the DMFS index, may not be optimal for identifying risk factors that manifest as specific decay patterns, especially if the risk factors such as genetic susceptibility loci have small individual effects. We used two methods to extract patterns of decay from surface-level caries data in order to generate novel phenotypes with which to explore the genetic regulation of caries. %26lt;br%26gt;Methods: The 128 tooth surfaces of the permanent dentition were scored as carious or not by intra-oral examination for 1,068 participants aged 18 to 75 years from 664 biological families. Principal components analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA), two methods of identifying underlying patterns without a priori surface classifications, were applied to our data. %26lt;br%26gt;Results: The three strongest caries patterns identified by PCA recaptured variation represented by DMFS index (correlation, r = 0.97), pit and fissure surface caries (r = 0.95), and smooth surface caries (r = 0.89). However, together, these three patterns explained only 37% of the variability in the data, indicating that a priori caries measures are insufficient for fully quantifying caries variation. In comparison, the first pattern identified by FA was strongly correlated with pit and fissure surface caries (r = 0.81), but other identified patterns, including a second pattern representing caries of the maxillary incisors, were not representative of any previously defined caries indices. Some patterns identified by PCA and FA were heritable (h(2) = 30-65%, p = 0.043-0.006), whereas other patterns were not, indicating both genetic and non-genetic etiologies of individual decay patterns. %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusions: This study demonstrates the use of decay patterns as novel phenotypes to assist in understanding the multifactorial nature of dental caries.

• 出版日期2012-3-9