Make it strategic! Financial investment logic is not enough

作者：Cooremans Catherine^*

来源：Energy Efficiency, 2011, 4(4): 473-492.

DOI：10.1007/s12053-011-9125-7

• Energy-efficiency gap
• Investment decision-making
• Capital budgeting tools
• Strategic investment
• Barriers to energy efficiency
• Indirect benefits of energy efficiency
• Public policy

Profitability is not the main driver of capital investment decision-making; financial evaluation tools often play a secondary role in corporate investment choices; businesses do not follow capital finance theory prescriptions, contrary to what mainstream claims; the strategic character of investments has a heavier decisional weight than profitability. These findings are based on a review of different streams of literature (mainly organizational finance and strategic decision-making) which is described in the second part of the paper, after a first part summarizing the main stances of mainstream energy economics and the main findings of the alternative literature on energy-efficiency investments. Yet, what is a strategic investment? To fill the existing conceptual gap, we propose a definition of strategic investment and a new theoretical framework to analyze investment projects. An example of applying this framework to an energy-efficiency project is described. The partial influence of financial factors and the importance of strategic factors in investment decisions entail several implications for energy-efficiency practitioners, scholars, and public program developers, which are described in the last part of the paper.

• 出版日期2011-11