Adverse periocular reactions to five types of prostaglandin analogs

作者：Inoue K^*; Shiokawa M; Higa R; Sugahara M; Soga T; Wakakura M; Tomita G

来源：Eye, 2012, 26(11): 1465-1472.

DOI：10.1038/eye.2012.195

• prostaglandin analogs
• adverse reactions
• eyelid pigmentation
• eyelash bristles
• patient%26apos
• s subjective evaluation
• physician%26apos
• s subjective evaluation

Purpose We investigated the appearance frequency of eyelid pigmentation and eyelash bristles after the use of five types of prostaglandin (PG) analogs. %26lt;br%26gt;Methods This study included 250 eyes from 250 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were treated with either latanoprost, travoprost, tafluprost, bimatoprost, or isopropyl unoprostone for %26gt;3 months in only one eye. Photographs of both eyes were obtained, and the images were assessed by three ophthalmologists who were masked to treatment type. The existence of eyelid pigmentation and eyelash bristles was judged, and images of the left and right eyes were compared. Subjective symptoms regarding the existence of eyelid pigmentation and eyelash bristles were investigated through a questionnaire. %26lt;br%26gt;Results There was no significant difference between the five types of medications with regard to eyelid pigmentation (P=0.537). Use of isopropyl unoprostone resulted in a significantly lower incidence of eyelash bristles (P%26lt;0.0001). The questionnaire investigation showed that eyelid pigmentation and eyelash bristles were significantly more frequent with travoprost (42.0% and 42.0%, respectively) and bimatoprost (58.0% and 60.0%, respectively) than with other three medications (P%26lt;0.0001). %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusion The appearance frequency of eyelid pigmentation was similar among the five types of PG analogs studied, and eyelash bristles appeared less frequently with isopropyl unoprostone use. Patients are conscious of eyelash bristles; therefore, these adverse effects should be sufficiently explained to patients before PG administration. Eye (2012) 26, 1465-1472; doi:10.1038/eye.2012.195; published online 5 October 2012

• 出版日期2012-11