Health Inequalities and Cost-Effectiveness: What do Important Health Policy Actors say about this Potential Conflict Situation?

作者：Hofmann M; Mielck A^*

来源：Gesundheitswesen, 2015, 77(2): 81-85.

DOI：10.1055/s-0034-1370996

• health inequalities
• cost-effectiveness
• prioritization
• trade-off

Objective: The German statutory health-care system is based on the principle of solidarity and thus it is committed to the objective of 'equal chances'. From an economic perspective it is also important to emphasise that scarcity of resources continuously pushes the services towards cost control and towards increasing cost-effectiveness. There could be conflicts between the 2 objectives 'equal chances' and 'cost-effectiveness', of course, for example if measures for increasing cost-effectiveness lead to increased financial burdens of the insured. To date it has not been studied if and how this potential conflict is discussed in Germany.
Methods: In a first step we searched for German publications discussing this potential conflict focusing on 3 major public health journals (Das Gesundheitswesen, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Ethik in der Medizin) and on the internet portal, gerechte-gesundheit.de". For the main part of the paper, we looked for publications from 4 major health policy actors (Bundesarztekammer, Zentrale Ethikkommission bei der Bundesarztekammer, Deutscher Ethikrat, Sachverstandigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen). All papers published since the year 2000 were included in the systematic qualitative analysis.
Results and Conclusion: The analyses show that the potential conflict between 'equal chances' and 'cost-effectiveness' is rarely discussed in any detail, at most in an implicit way. It would be important, though, to have an explicit discussion, supported by scientifically based analyses and recommendations. One step towards this objective could be, for example, a closer cooperation between social-epidemiologists and health-economists.

• 出版日期2015-2