Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Dementia: Diagnostic Value of the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire

作者：Sikkes Sietske A M^*; Pijnenburg Yolande A L; Knol Dirk L; de Lange de Klerk Elly S M; Scheltens Philip; Uitdehaag Bernard M J

来源：Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 2013, 26(4): 244-250.

DOI：10.1177/0891988713509139

• dementia
• sensitivity and specificity
• Alzheimer disease
• activities of daily living
• questionnaire
• informant
• diagnosis

Background: Measuring impairments in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) is important in dementia, but challenging due to the lack of reliable and valid instruments. We recently developed the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q; note 1). We aim to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the A-IADL-Q for dementia in a memory clinic setting. %26lt;br%26gt;Methods: Patients visiting the Alzheimer Center of the VU University Medical Center with their informants between 2009 and 2011 were included (N = 278). Diagnoses were established in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, independent of the A-IADL-Q scores. An optimal A-IADL-Q cutoff point was determined, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Area under the curves (AUCs) were compared between A-IADL-Q and disability assessment of dementia (DAD). The additional diagnostic value of the A-IADL-Q to Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was examined using logistic regression analyses. %26lt;br%26gt;Results: Dementia prevalence was 50.5%. Overall diagnostic accuracy based on the AUC was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.81) for the A-IADL-Q and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.77) for the DAD, which did not differ significantly. The optimal cutoff score for the A-IADL-Q was 51.4, resulting in sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.64. Combining the A-IADL-Q with the MMSE improved specificity (0.94), with a decline in sensitivity (0.55). Logistic regression models showed that adding A-IADL-Q improved the diagnostic accuracy (Z = 2.55, P = .011), whereas the DAD did not. %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusions: In this study, we showed a fair diagnostic accuracy for A-IADL-Q and an additional value in the diagnosis of dementia. These results support the role of A-IADL-Q as a valuable diagnostic tool.

• 出版日期2013-12