AGR2 diagnostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognosis

作者:Li, Yuejin; Wang, Weiwei; Liu, Zheliang; Jiang, Yuan; Lu, Jinping; Xie, Haitao; Tang, Faqing*
来源:Clinica Chimica Acta, 2018, 484: 323-327.
DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2017.12.023

摘要

Background: Anterior Gradient (AGR) 2 concentration increases in the serum of tumor patients, and their diagnostic and prognostic significances were evaluated in some tumors, The previous works showed that AGR2 high express in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) biopsy tissues. However, whether AGR2 serves as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for NPC remains unclear. Methods: 42 healthy volunteers, 34 breast cancer patients and 124 NPC patients were enrolled into this study, and the serum samples were collected from these healthy volunteers, breast cancer patients and NPC patients. Concomitantly, 79 frozen nasopharyngeal specimens consisted of 65 NPC tissues and 14 normal nasopharyngeal tissues were enrolled in the observation. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to estimate AGR2 concentration in the serum samples, and AGR2 mRNA expressions in the frozen tissue samples were detected by real time RT-PCR. Results: The real time RT-PCR results showed that AGR2 mRNA level was increased in NPC tissues compared with the normal nasopharyngeal tissues (p < 0.05). The ELISA data showed that AGR2 concentration in NPC serum was significantly higher in NPC patient serums than that in the health population (p < 0.05). And, AGR2 expression showed a correlation with tumor node metastasis (TNM) grade (p < 0.05) and Recurrence (p < 0.05). Moreover, the cumulative survival rate of patients with high concentration of AGR2 was significantly lower than that of patients with low concentration of AGR2 (p < 0.05), and the cumulative hazard rate of patients with high concentration of AGR2 was significantly higher than that with low concentration of AGR2 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Serum AGR2 can be used as a serum marker for clinical prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, serum AGR2 levels could not provide advantages in clinical practice for the differential diagnosis of cancer.