Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems?

作者：Marinho A C S; Martinho F C; Goncalves L M; Rabang H R C; Gomes B P F A^*

来源：International Endodontic Journal, 2015, 48(6): 542-548.

DOI：10.1111/iej.12346

• bacterial reduction
• disinfection
• endodontic treatment
• endotoxins
• reciprocating motion
• rotary instruments

AimTo evaluate the effectiveness of Reciproc for the removal of cultivable bacteria and endotoxins from root canals in comparison with multifile rotary systems.
MethodologyThe root canals of forty human single-rooted mandibular pre-molars were contaminated with an Escherichia coli suspension for 21days and randomly assigned to four groups according to the instrumentation system: GI - Reciproc (VDW); GII - Mtwo (VDW); GIII - ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer); and GIV -FKG Race (FKG Dentaire) (n=10 per group). Bacterial and endotoxin samples were taken with a sterile/apyrogenic paper point before (s1) and after instrumentation (s2). Culture techniques determined the colony-forming units (CFU) and the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay was used for endotoxin quantification. Results were submitted to paired t-test and anova.
ResultsAt s1, bacteria and endotoxins were recovered in 100% of the root canals investigated (40/40). After instrumentation, all systems were associated with a highly significant reduction of the bacterial load and endotoxin levels, respectively: GI - Reciproc (99.34% and 91.69%); GII - Mtwo (99.86% and 83.11%); GIII - ProTaper (99.93% and 78.56%) and GIV - FKG Race (99.99% and 82.52%) (P<0.001). No statistical difference were found amongst the instrumentation systems regarding bacteria and endotoxin removal (P>0.01).
ConclusionThe reciprocating single file, Reciproc, was as effective as the multifile rotary systems for the removal of bacteria and endotoxins from root canals.

• 出版日期2015-6