Protected Block Curriculum Enhances Learning During General Surgery Residency Training

作者:Webb Travis P*; Weigelt John A; Redlich Philip N; Anderson Rebecca C; Brasel Karen J; Simpson Deborah
来源:Archives of Surgery, 2009, 144(2): 160-166.
DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2008.558

摘要

Background: Changes in medical education require a rethinking of our training paradigm. We implemented a protected block curriculum for postgraduate year (PGY)-1 and PGY-2 surgery residents. Hypothesis: A protected block curriculum promotes adult learning consistent with the 6 competencies. Design: Prospective static-group comparison with pretesting and posttesting. Setting: Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Participants: Eight university-based surgical residents (curriculum group) and 8 residents who did not participate in the curriculum (control group). Main Outcome Measures: The curriculum occurs during protected time away from clinical activity. Pre-defined learning objectives and competencies were identified for PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents. Multiple choice examinations were administered to assess knowledge. The first 3 tests of the year in the PGY-2 curriculum were also given to the PGY-3 and PGY-4 and -5 residents for comparison with curriculum residents. In-training examination scores of control and curriculum residents were compared. Surgical and communication skills were assessed using checklist assessment forms. Curriculum residents evaluated the content and delivery. Results: Pretest and posttest results demonstrated acquisition of knowledge with improved aggregated mean scores from 57.5% to 71.4% for PGY-1 residents and 58.6% to 72.6% for PGY-2 residents. The average curriculum test results were 76.7% for curriculum residents, 56.9% for control residents, and 57.3% for all residents. The 2-year average in-training scores were 71.2% for curriculum and 60.3% for control residents. Assessments demonstrated improvements in communication and surgical skills. Conclusions: A protected block curriculum enhanced surgical residents' learning compared with a traditional model. Improvement in medical knowledge was easiest to measure, but performance in other Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency areas also demonstrated improvement.

  • 出版日期2009-2