Abdominoperineal Excision: Evolution of a Centenary Operation

作者：Campos Fabio Guilherme^*; Habr Gama Angelita; Nahas Sergio Carlos; Perez Rodrigo Oliva

来源：Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2012, 55(8): 844-853.

DOI：10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ab0f7

• Rectal cancer
• Ernest Miles
• Abdominoperineal resection
• Abdominoperineal excision

During the last century, great improvements have been made in rectal cancer management regarding preoperative staging, pathologic assessment, surgical technique, and multimodal therapies. Surgically, there was a move from a strategy characterized by simple perineal excision to complex procedures performed by means of a laparoscopic approach, and more recently with the aid of robotic systems. Perhaps the most important advance is that rectal cancer is no longer a fatal disease as it was at the beginning of the 20th century. This achievement is definitely due in part to Ernest Mile's contribution regarding lymphatic spread of tumor cells, which helped clarify the natural history of the disease and the proper treatment alternatives. He advocated a combined approach with the rationale to clear "the zone of upward spread." The aim of the present paper is to present a brief review concerning the evolution of rectal cancer surgery, focusing attention on Miles' abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APR) and its controversies and refinements over time. Although APR has currently been restricted to a small proportion of patients with low rectal cancer, recent propositions to excise the rectum performing a wider perineal and a proper pelvic floor resection have renewed interest on this procedure, confirming that Ernest Miles' original ideas still influence rectal cancer management after more than 100 years.

• 出版日期2012-8