Advance care planning in chronic kidney disease: A survey of current practice in Australia

作者：Luckett Tim; Spencer Lucy; Morton Rachael L; Pollock Carol A; Lam Lawrence; Silvester William; Sellars Marcus; Detering Karen M; Butow Phyllis N; Tong Allison; Clayton Josephine M^*

来源：Nephrology, 2017, 22(2): 139-149.

DOI：10.1111/nep.12743

• advance care planning
• chronic kidney disease
• conservative care
• current practice
• health professional view

AimAdvance care planning (ACP) in nephrology is widely advocated but not always implemented. The aims of this study were to describe current ACP practice and identify barriers/facilitators and perceived need for health professional education and chronic kidney disease (CKD)-specific approaches.
MethodsAn anonymous cross-sectional survey was administered online. Nephrology health professionals in Australia and New Zealand were recruited via professional societies, email lists and nephrology conferences. Multiple regression explored the influence of respondents' attributes on extent of involvement in ACP and willingness to engage in future.
ResultsA total of 375 respondents included nephrologists (23%), nurses (65%), social workers (4%) and others (8%) with 54% indicated that ACP at their workplace was performed ad hoc and 61% poorly. Perceived barriers included patient/family discomfort (84%), difficulty engaging families (83%), lack of clinician expertise (83%) and time (82%), health professional discomfort (72%), cultural/language barriers (65%), lack of private space (61%) and lack of formal policy/procedures (60%). Respondents overwhelmingly endorsed the need for more dialysis-specific ACP programs (96%) and education (95%). Whilst 85% thought ACP would be optimally performed by specially trained staff, comments emphasized that all clinicians should have a working proficiency. Respondents who were more willing to engage in future ACP tended to be non-physicians (odds ratio (OR) 4.96, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.74-14.07) and reported a greater need for CKD-specific ACP materials (OR 10.88, 95% CI 2.38-49.79).
ConclusionAdvance care planning in nephrology needs support through education and CKD-specific resources. Endorsement by nephrologists is important. A multidisciplinary approach with a gradient of ACP expertise is also recommended.
Summary at a Glance This survey of nephrologists in Australia and New Zealand provides data on the current practice of advance care planning and highlights the need for CKD-specific educational tools and a multidisciplinary approach.

• 出版日期2017-2