Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in patients with low ejection fraction: is there any additional long-term benefit?

作者：Mohammadi Siamak^*; Kalavrouziotis Dimitri; Cresce Giovanni; Dagenais Francois; Dumont Eric; Charbonneau Eric; Voisine Pierre

来源：European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2014, 46(3): 425-431.

DOI：10.1093/ejcts/ezu023

• Coronary artery bypass
• Bilateral internal thoracic arteries
• Long-term survival

The use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) has been associated with improved long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of BITA use on long-term survival among patients with low ejection fraction (EF) undergoing CABG.
Between April 1991 and October 2011, 2035 consecutive patients underwent primary BITA grafting. Among them, there were 129 patients with left ventricular EF a parts per thousand currency sign40%. During the same time period, 1666 primary CABGs were performed using a single internal thoracic artery (SITA) in patients with EF a parts per thousand currency sign40%. A propensity score optimal matching algorithm was used to create the matched SITA and BITA groups (n = 111 in each group). Also, Cox regression multivariable analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors for long-term mortality. The date of death was obtained from provincial vital statistics.
There was no difference in operative mortality between matched BITA and SITA (n = 2, 1.8% vs n = 1, 0.9%, respectively, P = 0.6) groups. The mean follow-up was 8.6 +/- 5.1 and 7.7 +/- 5.5 years for BITA and SITA groups, respectively (P = 0.2). Five-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 93.7, 77.5 and 59.0% in the matched BITA patients vs 82.8, 68.1 and 65.2% in the matched SITA patients (P = 0.3). In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for late mortality among hospital survivors were: insulin-dependent diabetes [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-8.4, P = 0.008], perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (HR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.5-6.9, P = 0.004), postoperative deep sternal wound infection (HR: 7.4, 95% CI: 2.2-24.1, P = 0.001) and neurological complications (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.4-8.4, P = 0.006). Choice of BITA versus SITA was not an independent predictor of long-term mortality (P = 0.3).
The use of a second internal thoracic artery (ITA) does not prolong late survival in patients with low EF undergoing CABG compared with a propensity-matched group of SITA graft patients.