科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Purpose: To assess the agreement of central and paracentral corneal thickness measurements between ultrasound pachymetry (LISP), Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).
Design: Observational cross-sectional study.
Participants: Seventy eyes of 70 subjects.
Methods. Each subject underwent Orbscan 11 (using an acoustic equivalent correction factor of 0.89), ASOCT, and LISP examination. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between instruments.
Main Outcome Measures: Central and paracentral corneal thickness measurements by the 3 methods and agreement, as evaluated by 95% limits of agreement (LOA).
Results: The mean measurements of average central corneal thickness by LISP, Orbscan 11, and ASOCT were 553.5 +/- 30.26 mu m, 553.22 +/- 25.47 mu m, and 538.79 +/- 26.22 mu m, respectively. There was high correlation between instruments: USP with ASOCT (r = 0.936, P<0.001), LISP with Orbscan 11 (r = 0.900, P<0.001) for central corneal thickness measurements, and Orbscan 11 with ASOCT for average paracentral 2- to 5-mm measurements (r = 0.947, P<0.001). The mean differences (and upper/lower LOA) for central corneal thickness measurements were 0.31 +/- 13.34 mu m (26.44/-25.83) between LISP and Orbscan 11, 14.74 +/- 10.84 mu m (36.0/ -6.51) between USP and ASOCT, and 14.44 +/- 9.14 mu m (32.36/-3.48) between Orbscan 11 and ASOCT. The average mean difference (and upper/lower LOA) between Orbscan 11 and ASOCT for paracentral 2- to 5-mm corneal thickness measurements was 10.35 +/- 8.67 mu m (27.35/-6.65).
Conclusion: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography underestimated corneal thickness compared with that measured with LISP. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography had better agreement with the gold standard USP, as compared with Orbscan II. However, important discrepancies among instruments exist. Clinicians should be aware that corneal thickness measurements are influenced by the method of measurement and that, although highly correlated, these instruments should not be used interchangeably for the assessment of corneal thickness.
