Distinct Effects of IL-6 Classic and Trans-Signaling in Bone Fracture Healing

作者：Prystaz Katja; Kaiser Kathrin; Kovtun Anna; Haffner Luntzer Melanie; Fischer Verena; Rapp Anna E; Liedert Astrid; Strauss Gudrun; Waetzig Georg H; John Stefan Rose; Ignatius Anita^*

来源：American Journal Of Pathology, 2018, 188(2): 474-490.

DOI：10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.10.011

Bone healing is a complex process with closely linked phases of inflammation, regeneration, and remodeling. IL-6 may crucially regulate this process; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. IL-6 signals are transmitted via the transmembrane glycoprotein 130 by two distinct mechanisms: classic signaling using the membrane-anchored IL-6 receptor and trans-signaling using its soluble form. Herein, we investigated the hypothesis that IL-6 classic and trans-signaling have different functions during bone healing. To investigate fracture healing, 12-week-old C57BL/6J mice underwent a femur osteotomy. To study the function of IL-6 during the inflammatory phase, either an anti IL-6 antibody, which inhibits IL-6 classic and trans-signaling, or soluble glycoprotein 130 fusion protein, which selectively blocks trans-signaling, was injected after 30 minutes and 48 hours. To analyze IL-6 effects in the repair phase, compounds were injected from day 7 onwards. Global IL-6 inhibition in the early phase after fracture reduced systemic inflammation, the recruitment of immune cells, and bone regeneration, resulting in delayed fracture healing. Global IL-6 inhibition during the repair phase disturbed bone formation and remodeling. In contrast, inhibition of IL-6 trans-signaling exerted minor effects on the immune response and did not influence bone repair, suggesting that the classic pathway accounts for most of the effects observed after global IL-6 inhibition. Our results reveal that IL-6 classic signaling, but not IL-6 trans-signaling, is essential for bone repair.

• 出版日期2018-2