Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

作者：Nickel Felix; Hendrie Jonathan D; Stock Christian; Salama Mohamed; Preukschas Anas A; Senft Jonas D; Kowalewski Karl F; Wagner Martin; Kenngott Hannes G; Linke Georg R; Fischer Lars; Mueller Stich Beat P

来源：European Surgical Research, 2016, 57(1-2): 1-9.

DOI：10.1159/000444449

• Cholecystectomy
• Laparoscopy
• Simulation
• Training

Purpose: The validated Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score is used for evaluating laparoscopic surgical performance. It consists of two subscores, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a Specific Technical Skills (STS) scale. The OSATS has accepted construct validity for direct observation ratings by experts to discriminate between trainees' levels of experience. Expert time is scarce. Endoscopic video recordings would facilitate assessment with the OSATS. We aimed to compare video OSATS with direct OSATS. Methods: We included 79 participants with different levels of experience [58 medical students, 15 junior residents (novices), and 6 experts]. Performance of a cadaveric porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was evaluated with OSATS by blinded expert raters by direct observation and then as an endoscopic video recording. Operative time was recorded. Results: Direct OSATS rating and video OSATS rating correlated significantly (rho = 0.33, p = 0.005). Significant construct validity was found for direct OSATS in distinguishing between students or novices and experts. Students and novices were not different in direct OSATS or video OSATS. Mean operative times varied for students (73.4 +/- 9.0 min), novices (65.2 +/- 22.3 min), and experts (46.8 +/- 19.9 min). Internal consistency was high between the GRS and STS subscores for both direct and video OSATS with Cronbach's a of 0.76 and 0.86, respectively. Video OSATS and operative time in combination was a better predictor of direct OSATS than each single parameter. Conclusion: Direct OSATS rating was better than endoscopic video rating for differentiating between students or novices and experts for LC and should remain the standard approach for the discrimination of experience levels. However, in the absence of experts for direct rating, video OSATS supplemented with operative time should be used instead of single parameters for predicting direct OSATS scores.

• 出版日期2016
• 单位河北医科大学