Nationwide survey on immunotherapy practice by ENT specialists

作者：Cornelis M; Rombaux Ph; Jorissen M; Hellings P W^*

来源：Rhinology, 2014, 52(1): 72-77.

• allergic rhinitis
• Belgium
• ENT
• immunotherapy

Background: According to the Federal Institution of Health Insurance, ENT doctors perform more skin prick tests for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR) than other medical specialties in Belgium. However, immunotherapy (IT) is not practiced by all. This study aims to obtain insight into IT practice by ENT doctors, the type of IT performed and the reasons not to perform IT.
Methodology: A questionnaire was sent to all registered ENT doctors of Belgium (n=648), involving questions on type and duration of ENT practice, geography and gender. In addition, the questionnaire informed about diagnosis of AR, indication for IT, type of IT performed, and reasons not to perform IT and referral pattern.
Results: The response rate among ENT doctors was 54%, with 7% of responders being excluded as they do not diagnose AR. 81% of Belgian ENT doctors make the indication for IT in AR patients, with 19% neglecting the indication for IT in AR patients. The two main reasons for not indicating IT are lack of expertise and the perception of high costs associated with IT. 70% of ENT specialists are practicing IT themselves, with sublingual IT being mostly performed. Interestingly, IT is mostly frequently performed by those ENT doctors with long-standing ENT practice, in private practice and in Wallonia.
Conclusion: Despite the high prevalence of AR in ENT practice, IT is most frequently performed by ENT doctors with longstanding practice, working in private practice and/or in the French speaking part of Belgium. Among the different types of IT sublingual IT is the most frequently performed means of IT by ENT doctors.

• 出版日期2014-3