Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience

作者：Shannon Lisa M; Birdwhistell Shira; Hulbig Shelia K; Jones Afton Jackson; Newell Jennifer; Payne Connie

来源：Evaluation and Program Planning, 2017, 63: 54-66.

DOI：10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.03.003

• Problem-solving courts
• Veterans' treatment court
• Communication
• Camaraderie
• Mentoring
• Accountability

Veterans' Treatment Courts (VTCs) are posited as a solution.to offer rehabilitation for veterans involved in the criminal justice system. Despite the pervasive implementation of VTCs, there is little research focused specifically on VTC implementation and outcomes, which are based on other problem-solving court models such as drug court. The current study presents qualitative process evaluation data from key stakeholders (n=21) and veteran participants (n=4) to show accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned during first-year implementation at two VTC sites. Quantitative performance data is also presented on veteran participants (n=19) served during the first year to show: types of services, monitoring, judicial interaction, sanctions/therapeutic responses, and rewards, as well as preliminary data on recidivism. Qualitative data, from both key stakeholders and veteran participants, suggests that offering rehabilitation via various program components, services/referrals, and accountability are critical to the success of the VTC. Data also provides valuable lessons learned for VTC implementation including communication, collaboration, information/protocols, and resources. Performance data shows that a variety of services are utilized and that frequent judicial interaction, drug testing, and sanctions are cornerstones of the VTC. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.

• 出版日期2017-8