Dose calculation of Acuros XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment with flattening filter free beams and the potential role of calculation grid size

作者：Huang Baotian; Wu Lili; Lin Peixian; Chen Chuangzhen^*

来源：Radiation Oncology, 2015, 10(1): 53.

DOI：10.1186/s13014-015-0357-0

• Dose difference
• Acuros XB
• Anisotropic analytical algorithm
• Stereotactic body radiotherapy
• Calculation grid size

Background: The study aimed to appraise the dose differences between Acuros XB (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment for lung cancer with flattening filter free (FFF) beams. Additionally, the potential role of the calculation grid size (CGS) on the dose differences between the two algorithms was also investigated.
Methods: SBRT plans with 6X and 10X FFF beams produced from the CT scan data of 10 patients suffering from stage I lung cancer were enrolled in this study. Clinically acceptable treatment plans with AAA were recalculated using AXB with the same monitor units (MU) and identical multileaf collimator (MLC) settings. Furthermore, different CGS (2.5 mm and 1 mm) in the two algorithms was also employed to investigate their dosimetric impact. Dose to planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) between the two algorithms were compared. PTV was separated into PTV_soft (density in soft-tissue range) and PTV_lung (density in lung range) for comparison.
Results: The dose to PTV_lung predicted by AXB was found to be 1.33 +/- 1.12% (6XFFF beam with 2.5 mm CGS), 2.33 +/- 1.37% (6XFFF beam with 1 mm CGS), 2.81 +/- 2.33% (10XFFF beam with 2.5 mm CGS) and 3.34 +/- 1.76% (10XFFF beam with 1 mm CGS) lower compared with that by AAA, respectively. However, the dose directed to PTV_soft was comparable. For OARs, AXB predicted a slightly lower dose to the aorta, chest wall, spinal cord and esophagus, regardless of whether the 6XFFF or 10XFFF beam was utilized. Exceptionally, dose to the ipsilateral lung was significantly higher with AXB.
Conclusions: AXB principally predicts lower dose to PTV_lung compared to AAA and the CGS contributes to the relative dose difference between the two algorithms.

• 出版日期2015-2-26
• 单位汕头大学