Measuring disease activity and damage in discoid lupus erythematosus

作者：Wahie S^*; McColl E; Reynolds N J; Meggitt S J

来源：British Journal of Dermatology, 2010, 162(5): 1030-1037.

DOI：10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09656.x

• discoid lupus erythematosus
• disease severity
• reliability
• scoring instrument
• validation

P>Background
Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a disfiguring inflammatory skin disease. There is no specific tool for measuring disease severity.
Objectives
To determine the features needed in a score measuring activity and damage in DLE and to investigate the score's reliability and its correlation with the physician's global assessment of disease severity and the patient-reported Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI).
Methods
The content of the score was determined following a peer review, pilot work in patients and a preliminary inter-rater reliability study. The Score of Activity and Damage in DLE (SADDLE) measures severity of activity (erythema, scale, induration) and damage (scarring/atrophy and dyspigmentation) attributable to DLE. Summed scores range between 0 and 195. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the score was tested using six assessors and nine patients with DLE. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) > 0 center dot 7 were considered evidence of good inter- and intrarater agreement.
Results
The mean +/- SD SADDLE score of nine patients in the inter-rater reliability study was 47 +/- 22 (range 14-102). There was good inter-rater agreement for the total score [ICC 0 center dot 82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0 center dot 61-0 center dot 95] and for the activity and damage scales, the individual physical signs and the total scores at individual body sites. The total score demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability (ICC 0 center dot 98; 95% CI 0 center dot 86-1 center dot 00). Although there was poor inter-rater agreement for global assessments (ICC 0 center dot 28; 95% CI 0 center dot 06-0 center dot 66), a good correlation was demonstrated between total scores and global assessments (r = 0 center dot 7). A weaker positive correlation was observed between disease activity scores and DLQI (r = 0 center dot 4).
Conclusions
The SADDLE measures activity and damage in patients with DLE. It demonstrates good inter- and excellent intrarater agreement, over and above that for global assessment. It correlates well with global assessment scores. Further studies are required to investigate SADDLE's responsiveness to change with therapy.

• 出版日期2010-5