A multi-objective mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem in order to minimize total costs in a Make-To-Order environment, considering order priority

作者：Manavizadeh N; Tavakoli L; Rabbani M^*; Jolai F

来源：Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2013, 32(1): 124-137.

DOI：10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.09.001

• Mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem
• Order priority
• Multi-objective
• Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
• Simulated annealing (SA)

Nowadays, mixed-model assembly line is used increasingly as a result of customers' demand diversification. An important problem in this field is determining the sequence of products for entering the line. Before determining the best sequence of products, a new procedure is introduced to choose important orders for entering the shop floor. Thus the orders are sorted using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach based on three criteria: critical ratio of each order (CRo), Significance degree of customer and innovation in a product, while the last one is presented for the first time. In this research, six objective functions are presented: minimizing total utility work cost, total setup cost and total production rate variation cost are the objectives which were presented previously, another objective is minimizing total idle cost, meanwhile two other new objectives regarding minimizing total operator error cost and total tardiness cost are presented for the first time. The total tardiness cost tries to choose a sequence of products that minimizes the tardiness cost for customers with high priority. First, to check the feasibility of the model, GAMS software is used. In this case, GAMS software could not search all of the solution space, so it is tried in two stages and because this problem is NP-hard, particle swarm optimization (PSO) and simulated annealing (SA) algorithms are used. For small sized problems, to compare exact method with proposed algorithms, the problem must be solved using meta-heuristic algorithms in two stages as GAMS software, whereas for large sized problems, the problem can be solved in two ways (one stage and two stages) by using proposed algorithms; the computational results and pairwise comparisons (based on sign test) show GAMS is a proper software to solve small sized problems, whereas for a large sized problem the objective function is better when solved in one stage than two stages; therefore it is proposed to solve the problem in one stage for large sized problems. Also PSO algorithm is better than SA algorithm based on objective function and pairwise comparisons.

• 出版日期2013-1