Assessing variability in compliance with recommendations given by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care using electronic records. The APNA study

作者：Brugos Larumbe Antonio^*; Aldaz Herce Pablo; Guillen Grima Francisco; Javier Garjon Parra Francisco; Javier Bartolome Resano Francisco; Teresa Arizaleta Beloqui Maria; Perez Ciordia Ignacio; Maria Fernandez Navascues Ana; Jose Lerena Rivas Maria; Berjon Reyero Jesus; Jusue Ripodas Luisa; Aguinaga Ontoso Ines

来源：Primary Care Diabetes, 2018, 12(1): 34-44.

DOI：10.1016/j.pcd.2017.06.008

• Diabetes mellitus
• Type 2
• Primary health care
• Variability in clinical practice
• Small-area analysis

Objective: Assess compliance with the IDF recommendations for patients with Diabetes Type2 (DM2), and its variability, by groups of doctors and nurses who provide primary care services in Navarre (Spain).
Materials and methodologies: A cross-sectional study of a population of 462,568 inhabitants, aged >= 18 years in 2013, attended by 381 units of doctor/nurse (quota). Clinical data were collected retrospectively through electronic records.
Using cluster analysis, we identified two groups of units according to the score for each indicator. We calculated the Odds Ratio, adjusted for age sex, BMI, socioeconomic status and smoking, for complying with each recommendation whether a patient was treated by one of the quota from the highest score to the lowest. 30,312 patients with DM2 were identified: prevalence: 6.39%; coefficient of variation between UDN: 22.8%; biggest cluster 7.7% and smallest 5.3%; OR = 1.54 (1.50-1.58).
The HbA1c control at <= 8% was 82.8% (82.2-83.3) and >9% was 7.6% (7.3-8.0), with OR 1.79 (1.69-1.89) and 2.62 (2.36-2.91) respectively. Control of BP and LDL-C show significant differences between the clusters.
Conclusions: An important variability was identified according to the doctor treating patients. The average HbA1c control is acceptable being limited in BP and LDL-C.

• 出版日期2018-2