As(V) retention on soils and forest by-products and other waste materials

作者：Seco Reigosa Natalia; Bermudez Couso Alipio; Garrido Rodriguez Beatriz; Arias Estevez Manuel; Fernandez Sanjurjo Maria J; Alvarez Rodriguez Esperanza; Nunez Delgado Avelino^*

来源：Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(9): 6574-6583.

DOI：10.1007/s11356-013-1730-x

• Arsenic adsorption
• Forest soil
• Mussel shell
• Pine wood ashes
• Sawdust
• Slate-processing fines

As(V) retention capacity is determined by means of adsorption/desorption trials performed for coarse and fine ground mussel shell, forest and vineyard soils with or without fine shell, pine wood ash, oak wood ash, pine sawdust and slate-processing fines. Pine ash shows the highest arsenic retention potential (with %26gt; 97 % adsorption and a parts per thousand currency sign1 % desorption), followed by shell-amended forest soil (adsorption between 96 and 92 %), by un-amended forest soil (adsorption between 98 and 86 %) and by the amended vineyard soil (adsorption between 92 and 75 %). Sawdust is the material with the lowest arsenic retention capacity in most cases, with un-amended vineyard soil also showing poor results. In the case of oak ash, As(V) percentage adsorption becomes higher with increasing added arsenic concentrations, while this increase in added arsenic causes lower percentage adsorption in the case of slate fines. Regarding adsorption ability, As(V) adsorption data were fitted to Freundlich and Langmuir models, showing good fitting, with pine ash and shell-amended forest soil having the highest K (F) values. In view of that, mussel shell amendment would be useful to increase arsenic retention on forest and vineyard soils, while pine ash could be used to retain arsenic even from wastewaters.

• 出版日期2013-9