科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Background and study aims: Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic resection of serrated polyps are partially predicated on the histology of the polyp(s) removed during the index exam. Histologic discrimination between sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P) and hyperplastic polyps is challenging. We devised and tested a simple tool - an envelope - that gastroenterologists can integrate into routine colonoscopy practice to address this problem. Methods: In the modified protocol, immediately after polypectomy each serrated polyp was flattened and enclosed in a paper envelope before being placed in formalin. In the pathology laboratory, each polyp was sectioned after processing. A two-site, prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial was performed to compare this modified protocol with the conventional protocol. Serrated polyps located proximal to the splenic flexure and 5 - 20 mm in diameter were included. A novel orientation score that measured the number of well-oriented crypts per unit area of polyp (higher orientation score = better orientation) was validated. Orientation score, SSA/P diagnosis rate, and inter-pathologist agreement were measured. Results: A total of 375 polyps were enrolled, of which 264 were identified for analysis. The mean orientation scores in the modified and conventional protocol groups were 3.11 and 1.13, respectively (P %26lt; 0.0001). SSA/Ps were diagnosed in 103/135 cases (76.3 %) in the modified protocol group vs. 54/129 (41.9 %) in the conventional protocol group (P %26lt; 0.0001). Inter-pathologist agreement was higher with the modified than the conventional protocol (77.0 % vs. 62.8 %; P = 0.015). Conclusion: Standard polyp handling techniques may be sub-optimal for interpretation of serrated polyps resected at colonoscopy, and may lead to inadvertent histologic under-grading of many lesions. Our intervention improved histopathologic interpretation and increased the SSA/P diagnosis rate.
- 出版日期2013-11
