Are humans disturbing conditions in ecology?

作者：Inkpen S Andrew^*

来源：Biology and Philosophy, 2017, 32(1): 51-71.

DOI：10.1007/s10539-016-9537-z

• Disturbing conditions
• Ecology
• Anthropogenic factors
• Nature
• Idealization

In this paper I argue, first, that ecologists have routinely treated humans-or more specifically, anthropogenic causal factors-as disturbing conditions. I define disturbing conditions as exogenous variables, variables "outside" a model, that when present in a target system, inhibit the applicability or accuracy of the model. This treatment is surprising given that (1) humans play a dominant role in many ecosystems and (2) definitions of ecology contain no fundamental distinction between human and natural. Second, I argue that the treatment of humans as disturbing conditions is an idealization: since it is, and has long been, known that humans are pervasive, this treatment amounts to an intentionally introduced theoretical distortion. Finally, characterizing this treatment as idealization forces us to confront the question of its justification, and so, drawing on three different kinds of idealization, I evaluate how this treatment may be justified.

• 出版日期2017-1