A cost-benefit analysis of the carbon footprint with hydrogen scooters and electric scooters

作者：Chang Ching Chih^*; Wu Fang Ling; Lai Wei Hsiang; Lai Ming Pin

来源：International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(30): 13299-13307.

DOI：10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.168

• Hydrogen fuel
• Carbon footprint
• Scooter
• Life Cycle Assessment
• Cost-benefit

This study analyzes the carbon footprint of an internal combustion engine scooter (ICE) and there are four types of electric scooters studied, namely: a hydrogen fueled scooter with on-board methanol steam reforming (on-board SMR), hydrogen scooter with methane steam reforming (SMR), plug-in electric scooter (PEV), and hybrid scooter. This paper also uses a sensitivity analysis to examine how the variations in fuel prices influence the cost benefit of using a hydrogen scooter. The research results are as follows: (1) SMR and on-board SMR have the smallest carbon (0.0115 kg CO2,e& 0.0117 kg CO2,e), PEV (0.0189 kg CO2,e), hybrid scooter (0.0614 kg CO2,e) and ICE (0.1378 kg CO2,e); the percentage of carbon emissions relative to ICE by each scooter are, in ascending order, 8%, 8%, 14% and 45%; (2) according to the ISO14067 standard, capital goods (fixed costs) cannot be accounted into total life cycle costs, and total life cycle costs excluding fixed costs are in descending order, SMR ($6632), ICE ($4233), on-board SMR ($3643), hybrid scooter ($3368) and PEV ($2824); (3) the variation of fuel price is the key factor of using hydrogen scooters.

• 出版日期2016-8-10