A Model for Emergency Department End-of-life Communications After Acute Devastating EventsuPart I: Decision-making Capacity, Surrogates, and Advance Directives*

作者：Limehouse Walter E^*; Feeser V Ramana; Bookman Kelly J; Derse Arthur

来源：Academic Emergency Medicine, 2012, 19(9): E1068-E1072.

DOI：10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01426.x

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19: 10681072; (C) 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Abstract Making decisions for a patient affected by sudden devastating illness or injury traumatizes a patients family and loved ones. Even in the absence of an emergency, surrogates making end-of-life treatment decisions may experience negative emotional effects. Helping surrogates with these end-of-life decisions under emergent conditions requires the emergency physician (EP) to be clear, making medical recommendations with sensitivity. This model for emergency department (ED) end-of-life communications after acute devastating events comprises the following steps: 1) determine the patients decision-making capacity; 2) identify the legal surrogate; 3) elicit patient values as expressed in completed advance directives; 4) determine patient/surrogate understanding of the life-limiting event and expectant treatment goals; 5) convey physician understanding of the event, including prognosis, treatment options, and recommendation; 6) share decisions regarding withdrawing or withholding of resuscitative efforts, using available resources and considering options for organ donation; and 7) revise treatment goals as needed. Emergency physicians should break bad news compassionately, yet sufficiently, so that surrogate and family understand both the gravity of the situation and the lack of long-term benefit of continued life-sustaining interventions. EPs should also help the surrogate and family understand that palliative care addresses comfort needs of the patient including adequate treatment for pain, dyspnea, or anxiety. Part I of this communications model reviews determination of decision-making capacity, surrogacy laws, and advance directives, including legal definitions and application of these steps; Part II (which will appear in a future issue of AEM) covers communication moving from resuscitative to end-of-life and palliative treatment. EPs should recognize acute devastating illness or injuries, when appropriate, as opportunities to initiate end-of-life discussions and to implement shared decisions.

• 出版日期2012-9