Additional Comments on "An Essay on Contact Angle Measurements" by M. Strobel and C. S. Lyons

作者:Montes Ruiz Cabello Francisco Javier; Angel Rodriguez Valverde Miguel; Cabrerizo Vilchez Miguel A
来源:Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2011, 8(5): 363-366.
DOI:10.1002/ppap.201100043

摘要

After the impact of the great review of M. Strobel and C. S. Lyons on contact angle measurements, we discuss some claims of the authors. The Wilhelmy method is not generally "the best technique for measuring the contact angle hysteresis'' as the authors claimed. Otherwise, we think that, even though equilibrium contact angle is an "unattainable'' angle, the most-stable contact angle obtained from the system relaxation is experimentally accessible. The most-stable contact angle is energetically significant for evaluating quantitatively the surface energy value of rough, chemically homogeneous surfaces from the Wenzel equation, and the average surface energy of smooth, chemically heterogeneous surfaces from the Cassie equation. The most-stable contact angle, the advancing contact angle and the receding contact angles enable the thermodynamic description of the range of contact angle hysteresis and the distribution of metastable system configurations.

  • 出版日期2011-5-20