A SURVEY OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS REGARDING DUE PROCESS, FINANCIAL PRESSURES, AND THE ABILITY TO ADVOCATE FOR PATIENTS

作者：McNamara Robert M^*; Beier Kevin; Blumstein Howard; Weiss Larry D; Wood Joseph

来源：Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2013, 45(1): 111-+.

DOI：10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.12.019

• due process
• emergency medicine
• practice
• termination

Background: A 1998 survey of emergency physicians indicated that many were threatened with adverse actions when advocating regarding the quality of care or raising concerns about financial issues. Study Objectives: To assess the current state of these issues. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey of emergency physicians was conducted using the American Medical Association%26apos;s database. Results: Of the 1035 emergency physicians who received the survey, 389 (37.6%) answered the questions. Over half had been in practice for 16 or more years and 86% were board certified. Of those who knew the answer to the question, 62% (197 of 317) reported that their employer could terminate them without full due process and 76% (216 of 284) reported that the hospital administration could order their removal from the clinical schedule. Nearly 20% reported a possible or real threat to their employment if they raised quality-of-care concerns. Financial pressures related to admission, discharge, and transfer of patients were also noted by a number of respondents. Physicians who worked for contract management companies reported a higher incidence of impaired practice rights. Conclusion: Practicing emergency physicians continue to report substantial concerns regarding their ability to speak up about the quality of care and pressure regarding financial matters related to patient care.

• 出版日期2013-7