Accuracy of Estimating Resting Oxygen Uptake and Implications for Hemodynamic Assessment

作者：Narang Nikhil; Gore M Odette; Snell Peter G; Ayers Colby R; Lorenzo Santiago; Carrick Ranson Graeme; Babb Tony G; Levine Benjamin D; Khera Amit; de Lemos James A; McGuire Darren K^*

来源：American Journal of Cardiology, 2012, 109(4): 594-598.

DOI：10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.010

The Fick principle (cardiac output [Q(c)] = oxygen uptake [Vo(2)]/arteriovenous oxygen difference) can be used to calculate Q(c), with VO2 frequently estimated by derived equations. To compare the accuracy of measured versus estimated VO2, data were analyzed from 2 studies in which VO2 at rest was measured using the Douglas bag technique. One study comprised adults with diabetes, and the other was an exercise study of healthy adults. VO2 at rest was estimated as VO2 (ml/min) = 125 ml/min/m(2) x body surface area (m(2)), with sensitivity analyses evaluating 2 other commonly used equations. Mean absolute difference (milliliters per minute) and ordinary least products regression were used to assess agreement between measured and estimated VO2. Overall, mean measured versus estimated VO2 differed significantly (307.2 +/- 75.2 vs 259.9 +/- 36.7 ml/min, p < 0.0001), with a mean absolute difference of 52.9 +/- 43.2 ml/min (p < 0.0001); 20% of the estimates differed by >25% from the measured VO2. Mean absolute difference increased from 36.7 ml/min in the lowest body mass index group (<25 kg/m(2)) to 91.7 ml/min in the highest group (>= 40 kg/m(2)) (p for trend = 0.001) and was significantly higher in men than in women (65.6 vs 33.9 ml/min, p = 0.001); error was similar by median-split age (p = 0.65) and race (p = 0.34). Similar results were obtained when evaluating each of the other 2 estimating equations. Estimation of VO2 at rest is inaccurate, especially in men and with increasing adiposity. In conclusion, when clinical hemodynamic assessment is performed, VO2 should be measured, not estimated.

• 出版日期2012-2-15