New approach of ultra-focal brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer with custom-linked I-125 seeds: A feasibility study of optimal dose coverage

作者：Brun Thomas^*; Bachaud Jean Marc; Graff Cailleaud Pierre; Malavaud Bernard; Portalez Daniel; Popotte Christian; Aziza Richard; Lusque Amelie; Filleron Thomas; Ken Soleakhena

来源：Brachytherapy, 2018, 17(3): 544-555.

DOI：10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.011

• I-125 seeds
• Ultra-focal brachytherapy
• Prostate cancer
• Registration

PURPOSE: To present the feasibility study of optimal dose coverage in ultra-focal brachytherapy (UFB) with multiparametric MRI for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: UFB provisional dose plans for small target volumes (<7 cc) were calculated on a prostate training phantom to optimize the seeds number and strength. Clinical UFB consisted in a contour-based nonrigid registration (MRI/Ultrasound) to implant a fiducial marker at the location of the tumor focus. Dosimetry was performed with iodine-125 seeds and a prescribed dose of 160 Gy. On CT scans acquired at 1 month, dose coverage of 152 Gy to the ultra-focal gross tumor volume was evaluated. Registrations between magnetic resonance and CT scans were assessed on the first 8 patients with three software solutions: VariSeed, 3D Slicer, and Mirada, and quantitative evaluations of the registrations were performed. Impact of these registrations on the initial dose matrix was performed.
RESULTS: Mean differences between simulated dose plans and extrapolated Bard nomogram for UFB volumes were 36.3% (26-56) for the total activity, 18.3% (10-30) for seed strength, and 22.5% (16-38) for number of seeds. Registration method implemented in Mirada performed significantly better than VariSeed and 3D Slicer (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0357, respectively). For dose plan evaluation between Mirada and VariSeed, D-100 % (Gy) for ultra-focal gross tumor volume had a mean difference of 28.06 Gy, mean values being still above the objective of 152 Gy. D-90% for the prostate had a mean difference of 1.17 Gy. For urethra and rectum, dose limits were far below the recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: This UFB study confirmed the possibility to treat with optimal dose coverage target volumes smaller than 7 cc.

• 出版日期2018-6