Neuroethics in Spain: Neurological Determinism or Moral Freedom?

作者：Bonete Enrique^*

来源：Neuroethics, 2013, 6(1): 225-232.

DOI：10.1007/s12152-012-9151-y

• Neuroethics
• Freedom
• Neurological determinism
• Philosophical neuroethics
• Practical neuroethics
• Bioethics
• %26quot
• Neurological turn%26quot
• Libet experiment
• Neurolaw
• Neuroeducation
• Human rights

Spanish culture has recently shown interest about Neuroethics, a new line of research and reflection. It can be said that two general, and somewhat opposing, perspectives are currently being developed in Spain about neuroethics-related topics. One originates from the neuroscientific field and the other from the philosophical field. We will see, throughout this article, that the Spanish authors, who I am going to select here, deal with very diverse neuroethical topics and that they analyse them from different intellectual assumptions. However, I consider that there is one constant concern, which emerges extensively or briefly in each one of the books that I am going to present. I am referring to the problem of freedom. Spanish neuroscientists, in general, stress and accept the new determinism that emanates from recent research about the brain, whilst those who engage in the study of philosophy usually point in their texts to the limitations of empirical research that purport to %26quot;demonstrate%26quot; the new neurological determinism. I will dedicate the last section, which is more extensive in length, to the work that I consider the most valuable, at least until the present day, and whose title is Neuro,tica y Neuropolitica (Tecnos, Madrid, 2011). Professor Adela Cortina (chair of Moral Philosophy at Valencia University and member of the Spanish Royal Academy of Moral and Political Science) is its author. But, firstly, I am going to refer to the works written by neuroscientists, and then to those written by philosophers. This will enable us to obtain a global view of the neuroethics models that are being constructed in Spain.

• 出版日期2013-4