摘要

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg with active comparators and placebo with regard to a composite endpoint of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), weight and hypoglycaemia, using post hoc analyses. Methods: A logistic regression analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat population, using data from the last observation carried forward, and the composite endpoint of HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), no weight gain (<= 0 kg) and no hypoglycaemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/l or severe hypoglycaemia) after 26weeks for each trial in the AWARD programme separately. Results: At 26 weeks, within each study, 37-58% of patients on dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 27-49% of patients on dulaglutide 0.75mg, and 9-61% of patients on active comparators achieved the composite endpoint. Significantly more patients reached the composite endpoint with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with metformin, sitagliptin, exenatide twice daily or insulin glargine: odds ratio (OR) 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0, 2.2; p<0.05], OR 4.5 (95% CI 3.0, 6.6; p<0.001), OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.8, 3.7; p<0.001) and OR 7.4 (95% CI 4.4, 12.6; p<0.001), respectively, with no difference between dulaglutide 1.5 mg and liraglutide 1.8mg. In addition, significantly more patients reached the composite endpoint with dulaglutide 0.75mg than with sitagliptin or insulin glargine: OR 3.3 (95% CI 2.2, 4.8; p<0.001) and OR 4.5 (95% CI 2.7, 7.8; p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Dulaglutide is an effective treatment option, resulting in a similar or greater proportion of patients reaching the HbA1c target of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), without weight gain or hypoglycaemia compared with active comparators.

  • 出版日期2016-1